Forum Archive Home -> Feedback -> Suggestions for new moderators
Suggestions for new moderators | ||||||
| freebird73717 posted 2009 Jun 03 22:34 | ||||||
| Okay there was a thread that brought to attention that we are lite on mods with only redwudz, yoda, satstorm, and faustus actively frequenting the board. Baldrick himself even said it might be time to pick a new mod or two. So who would you suggest? This can let Baldrick know who the community thinks would be a good mod.
I personally can think of three people that in my opinnion would be good mods. Jagabo, jman98, and manono. Manono is already a mod at doom9 so he may not want the added responsibility. Jagabo and jman98 are both helpful, knowledgeable, and follow the forums rules well and I think would make good mods. So who do you think would be a good moderator? | ||||||
| z0mbie posted 2009 Jun 03 23:07 | ||||||
| This is my opinion & my opinion only, so no need for anyone to get nasty with me, but why do we need more moderators?, I think we need a couple of our older members to behave them selves a little more, so the moderators we do have can actualy moderate with a little less burden, rather than give them extra duties by creating/causing havoc in certain threads, they have been doing a darn fine job so far, they don't look to be run off there feet in anyway, it's just a couple of older members getting there nickers in a knot over an occasional new member that does not know the ropes as yet, they/we mean no harm. | ||||||
| disturbed1 posted 2009 Jun 03 23:43 | ||||||
I think that guy freebird73717 would make a good mod ;) Oh, and edDV needs at least a special title. His posts go far beyond the average help you'd get at any forum. | ||||||
| lordsmurf posted 2009 Jun 04 02:42 | ||||||
| Zombie, I agree with you -- BUT -- moderating is more than saying "hey guys, break it up". There is spam to manage, posts to move, sometimes stickies and polls to assist with.
I almost wonder if there should be a class of normal Moderator that ONLY does the latter part, reserving "hey guys, behave" for a few Super Mods. When I volunteered all those years ago, that's really all I wanted to help with. When you're a Super Mod, you sort of get sucked in to messes, mostly via PMs, and it's "your duty" to the forum to fix it (or somehow try to end it). At least you did back in those days, when "IBTL" was a game, and it seemed there was a crowd dedicated to causing trouble. I remember death threads issued to mods/members, stalkers hunting down mods/members, hourly spam problems, etc (most of that stuff is hidden away or outright deleted, you won't see it in the public forum archives) -- stuff is different now. Still some issues, but on the whole, it's a lot better. Sadly, a drop in traffic is one reason, but still -- take the positives. | ||||||
| fritzi93 posted 2009 Jun 04 04:46 | ||||||
| Guns1inger's another possibility; very knowledgeable, helpful and patient (!). And he spends an awful lot of time here, it seems. :P
There are other possibilities of course. That Freebird guy, for instance. :wink: | ||||||
| SatStorm posted 2009 Jun 04 06:09 | ||||||
| According the current traffic of the site, one new mod could be usefull.
Also, beyond the troubles we have to deal with (and LS explained), most of the problems happens (or started) on the off topic section. So, I'll suggest again to Baldrick the termination of the specific subforum, since it only brings trouble, lead the forum to non technical subjects, it is not international, and has members that spend their lifes posting there all the time, with no other reason to be around. (yeah, I know, I'm a joy killer, so what? ) Anyway, for a mod, I wouldn't like an Off Topic frequenter. We tried that in the past and failed misserable. What this forum needs, is a dedicated video enthusiast, newbie friendly, with passion about our hobby, understanding of international culture, and a wide knowledge of laws, outside of the USA. Someone which understand the new needs of our scene and knows how to deal against the traps of the Big Ones. I would love to see a moderator from SouthEast Asia, Japan, India or even China. We need this, because this is an international forum. Any suggestions in that direction? | ||||||
| gadgetguy posted 2009 Jun 04 06:22 | ||||||
| All of the new Mod suggestions that I would make have already been suggested so I won't repeat them as this is not a democracy and we don't get a vote. SatStorm's suggestion is good, but I would add that a good working knowledge of English be included in that list of qualifications. All of the rest is meaningless if he/she can't be understood. | ||||||
| fritzi93 posted 2009 Jun 04 06:38 | ||||||
Yeah, but what title would be sufficiently dignified? Titles like "guru" and "expert" are overused and cheapened on so many other websites. | ||||||
| SatStorm posted 2009 Jun 04 07:16 | ||||||
| I agree with fritzi93
Titles, Crowns, etc... Useless stuff. The nickname of a user, is all he needs. He can build his reputation on it - if that is his goal. That is internet. Titles exist for those who don't understand the internet. edDV has won the respect of his fellow members, so his nickname is his title. Same way Lord Smurf is well known, or others. Something more won't add something to him. Regarding the english skills, there is a definatelly plus. I'm below those skills myself, so I know the difficulties (and the traps that some people can set up just because of the existance of this fact). Ethicks, expression, understanding of what is allowed and what is not, differs from region to region. This forum here the last years has adapted an attitude centered around the "USA way" of doing things and that backfired eventually, by banning or distant the international members. It's time to change that. So, I believe, someone from those regions I mention, will trully help this forum. IMHO, killing the mother of troubles, the off topic section, would help too. But it is not up to me to decide that. If it was, off topic wouldn't exist 5 years now. | ||||||
| freebird73717 posted 2009 Jun 04 07:29 | ||||||
I don't think anyone will get nasty with you. You've said nothing for anyone to get nasty about. You have some valid points. But I think there is still need for additional moderator/s.
For the most part off topic is harmless fun. But yes there have been threads that went to far in the end. I'd hate to see off topic go. I like posting funny vids in off topic.
| ||||||
| bendixG15 posted 2009 Jun 04 07:34 | ||||||
| Keep Off Topic. Killing it won't stop the OT posters, they'll just post elsewhwere and screw up other forums.
At least now with an OT forum you can just avoid going there and not be subject to their antics. | ||||||
| G)-(OST posted 2009 Jun 04 07:56 | ||||||
| SatStorm, the only problem with that is, about 3 years ago, I was the one who inspired Baldrick to get rid of a similar Topic (can't remember what it was called) where members posted in about every single thing that someone was doing wrong, mostly the new members, again, there was a great debate where a lot of the members still wanted it around so they can report people in front of everyone, sought of like a power trip, but in the end Baldrick saw fit to make it only veiwable by you guys, because it was causing trouble, I won in the end, so i thought, here is a link to that thread I started in 2006 http://forum.videohelp.com/topic308357.html anyway, the members that felt the need to shame people in front of everyone found another way of doing it, hence OT & Feedback, I think no matter what, there will always be a way for these people to do what they do best by treading on that fine line, I found out the hard way, that I did not know what that fine line was, but I have learned my lesson well, all I would like to see is, new members being treated with respect, just like eveyone here wants to be treated, there is no need for the garbage that goes on at OT & FB, get rid of members that are causing this, not the topics, we may as well kiss videohelp good bye if we bow down to them.
Denis | ||||||
| AlanHK posted 2009 Jun 04 08:20 | ||||||
People who hang out at a forum tend to want to post on all kinds of subjects. I'm mystified why people ask technical questions that are far off topic here, for instance. If I answer it's usually to pit them to a more appropriate forum. I expect these suggestions are mostly ignored. Similarly, people who want to vent on something want to do it here, where they're already logged in. If you give them an off-topic forum, they can post there and everyone else can just ignore it. In a local forum I use we have an anything-goes subforum, invisible unless you have applied for membership, called "Fight Club" You can go there and call anyone names, make bigoted remarks, no one cares. You will be insulted in turn, of course. The alternative would have been to temporarily or permanently ban several members. This let them have their fun, while not offending normal users. If they were offensive in the main forum they could be warned or sanctioned. One useful feature is that posts in that forum will expire after 30 days. That prevents people browsing old flame wars and getting indignant and reigniting them. | ||||||
| lordsmurf posted 2009 Jun 04 09:12 | ||||||
| OT forums are supposed to be fun. I rather enjoy some of the odd banter. | ||||||
| poisondeathray posted 2009 Jun 04 09:39 | ||||||
The classic "gravedigger" syndrome. What's the oldest gravedig you guys have seen? I think I saw one from recently from 2001 and I think AlanHK has been a victim a few times :) A counterpoint would be sometimes there is useful information in those old threads, and not being able to access them would be a shame and repetetive when you provide the same info over and over. I think Guns1linger would make a good mod. He is helpful, patient and firm but fair, and doesn't take crap | ||||||
| G)-(OST posted 2009 Jun 04 09:40 | ||||||
Try being on the receiving side, then let us know how fun it is | ||||||
| ricardouk posted 2009 Jun 04 09:44 | ||||||
| Like Satstorm and gadgetguy said i too would like to see a "international mod", some members dont realize that not everyone that visits this forum is from the USA, perhaps the creation of localized sub forum with just one category like general help for example, it doesnt need to be a fully fledged localized version, just an help sub topic. | ||||||
| Nelson37 posted 2009 Jun 04 10:00 | ||||||
| What would IMO be more helpful to those with limited english would be some sort of translation, we have many members here with multiple language skills. Those with limited english could ask for help making some of the more complicated questions more clear.
That would make the forum more accessible as opposed to more limited, specific-language subforums. I disagree with Ghost on making reported posts non-public, I thought that section provided useful examples of what should not be done. Now I'll have to look at the old post and see if I said anything at the time. | ||||||
| Anakin posted 2009 Jun 04 10:29 | ||||||
| Anyone but Guns1linger. Mods need to know how to talk to people. | ||||||
| redwudz posted 2009 Jun 04 11:02 | ||||||
| Another consideration for a Mod is which international timezone he's in to help with 24hr/day coverage. (We all have to sleep sometime. :lol: ) | ||||||
| filmboss80 posted 2009 Jun 04 11:08 | ||||||
| [quote="Anakin"]Anyone but Guns1linger. Mods need to know how to talk to people.[/quote]
You are in a tiny minority, Anakin. While it is true that Guns1inger does not suffer fools gladly, he is very generous in providing a wealth of useful information. He has my vote. | ||||||
| ricardouk posted 2009 Jun 04 11:17 | ||||||
Nelson37, that would make people stay away, specific sub language forums is more "friendly", can you imagine logging yourself to videohelp and having to answer all those request for translating. I dont know if Baldrick thought about it but from this "side" specific sub forums are way more friendly, i recommend this site to a few friends but they didnt register. | ||||||
| SatStorm posted 2009 Jun 04 11:18 | ||||||
| Local subforums don't work. Doom9 tried it, no success.
Regarding the fun on the off topic forum, no: You must be a middle age American to have fun there. For a great deal of the rest of us, you don't like to read a description of how awful it is, because if I do it, you won't like it. And if Off topic was so fun, show me a post in which the non Americans had fun there... The last time I said those things, I called fascist, racist, etc. And because of this attitude, non spoken again about this point of view ever since. Most international users simply left. And we end up today to what we end up. I'm a member of this forum for many years and I have a clean view about who and what cause the troubles around. The "Off Topic" ghetto, because it is a ghetto there now, is the biggest one. Plain and Simply. There are other problems too. But we can't solve them all at once. The Off Topic problem, come first in my agenda. Regarding the timezone, when we had mods from Australia, Israel, Sweden, we didn't have so many problems. Now it is me (E.E.T) and Baldrick (CET). The rest are from USA. So, we need someone from China, India, Japan, Southeast Asia or Australia. I would prefer someone of asia origin. Misunderstandings because of language barriers, different culture and different laws, could be solved easier that way. You have to be one of them to judge them. | ||||||
| ricardouk posted 2009 Jun 04 11:41 | ||||||
| SatStorm i was in portuguese subforum and i can tell you it works. The problem was having subforums detached from the doom9 site, a pain to make it work whenever changing hosts was required, here if baldrick opens subforums they will stay inside the site and not like doom9 was. Very different situations | ||||||
| SatStorm posted 2009 Jun 04 11:50 | ||||||
| I don't believe that this is a solution. Terms, knowledge, articles, mostly are in English. Every country has local forums for local use.
This is an international forum and the success it has is based exactly on this. The attitude and the understanding towards non english users must change, not to make local subforums. | ||||||
| AlanHK posted 2009 Jun 04 12:17 | ||||||
I've been here 3 years and never, until today, ventured into "Off topic". And after looking, I can't see what the fuss is, but anyway I won't bother to go back, I suggest you just ignore it. How can it be a "problem"? The web is full of unpleasant sites. You can't delete them all, you just stay away. | ||||||
| SatStorm posted 2009 Jun 04 12:29 | ||||||
| Well, I done that suggestion myself some years ago, and it was wrong.
Now, I'm not gonna ignore it. | ||||||
| AlanHK posted 2009 Jun 04 12:53 | ||||||
So it's so repulsive you can't bring yourself to explain the problem? | ||||||
| SatStorm posted 2009 Jun 04 13:08 | ||||||
| For someone not involved, you show a great interest on the subject.
Also, I didn't know the world "repulsive", I had to use google translate to understand it. My answer is: Yes, it is. BTW, do you have someone to suggest for the mod position? | ||||||
| freebird73717 posted 2009 Jun 04 13:20 | ||||||
| Yes lets try to bring this back on topic.
We are getting to far off topic talking about off topic! :lol: So... anyone else got suggestions for mods? | ||||||
| ricardouk posted 2009 Jun 04 15:16 | ||||||
| @SatStorm
you're mistaken, with the level of videohelp or doom9 they dont exist, dont know any portuguese or on our neighbours (Spain). Well we agree in disagreing. About the mod....Yoda you're the expert on pools.... | ||||||
| Dv8ted2 posted 2009 Jun 04 15:21 | ||||||
| I nominate Noahtuck. He is helpful, knows how to talk to people and mindful of the forum rules. | ||||||
| aedipuss posted 2009 Jun 04 15:26 | ||||||
| all this is well and fine, but i still haven't seen king baldrick ask for nominees. i'd assume he'd just ask whomever he wishes if he wishes, and not call on the riffraff to vote someone into servitude. | ||||||
| redwudz posted 2009 Jun 04 15:51 | ||||||
| Yep, the pay and hours suck. Don't quit your day job. :lol: We have about 172, 231 members at present. It may take a while to sort. :roll:
Actually our visitors have increased somewhat, about 2,000,000 in January. Not as high as in 2006, but improving. I don't see a big problem with non-native English speakers. We seem to be able to communicate well enough most times. And Babel Fish has helped me out a few times. :) | ||||||
| gll99 posted 2009 Jun 04 16:45 | ||||||
| I like some of the names advanced here mainly because some have a high degree of subject matter knowledge, are fairly active and are mostly courteous when answering questions. My feelings is that Baldrick and the existing mods have a better handle on the needs and should discuss it privately. | ||||||
| VegasBud posted 2009 Jun 04 17:05 | ||||||
| I partially agree with aedipuss, in that I believe the correct protocol, when you're living in a baldrickarchy, is to just accept the reigning Baldrick's governing decisions. Even if you're not a big believer in societal protocols, this is his site. He's also been here longer than anyone else, he's the only one who knows what it takes to keep this place running smoothly, and ultimately he's the one who's going to have to clean up the mess if a new mod goes all "Jekyll and Hyde" and starts eating newbies by the handful.
I'm not so sure about the "riffraff" part of aedipuss' post, but that could just be chalked up to the "a rose by any other name..." consideration. My suggestion for a new moderator? Anyone who's fair, honest, helpful, patient, diligent, responsible, motivated to do a good job, and wise enough to tread the (sometimes) fine line between maintaining order while still encouraging open discussions. By the way, would just cloning an existing mod be completely out of the question? | ||||||
| G)-(OST posted 2009 Jun 05 01:56 | ||||||
| sorry! | ||||||
| redwudz posted 2009 Jun 05 02:02 | ||||||
| One last chance. Stay on topic or this thread will be locked, or deleted as I have done with the last few posts in it.
Moderator redwudz | ||||||
| AlanHK posted 2009 Jun 05 02:40 | ||||||
| Regarding moderation of "Off-topic", it might be considered to appoint some moderators only for that forum, drawn from its denizens, making poachers into gamekeepers.
Then moderators who aren't familiar with the subculture wouldn't be called in to put out fires. | ||||||
| G)-(OST posted 2009 Jun 05 03:06 | ||||||
| We need someone who will stop such rubbish being posted, not the rubish posters them selves, I still think SatStorm is on the money
@ AlanHK Check your profile, some one has been using your account, there are 17 posts in the OT by AlanHK, I thought I might mention it since you said:
| ||||||
| AlanHK posted 2009 Jun 05 03:46 | ||||||
You can't "Stop" something being posted. Moderators can only react, not prevent. Unless they just ban posters on suspicion.
I'll take your word for it. But as I never browse the O-T forum, I must have got to the thread directly, by a link or search and never noticed which forum the post I was replying to was in. So I missed all the spicy gossip. | ||||||
| SatStorm posted 2009 Jun 05 04:14 | ||||||
| AlanHK, since you are not active on the Off Topic section, let those who are involved talk and discuss about it.
I'll be glad to read your suggestions and propositions regarding the subforums that you are active. And yes, we can't stop something being posted. But we can cut down the chances to have to. So, on topic: Have you any suggestions to do, for new moderators? | ||||||
| AlanHK posted 2009 Jun 05 04:42 | ||||||
I moderate in a very lively forum where these issues have come up and been addressed so I thought I would share my experience.
I did, above. I suggest that if you want to have a private conversation, that you do it via PM, and not in a public forum. If you object to my posts, please feel free to report me. | ||||||
| SatStorm posted 2009 Jun 05 05:09 | ||||||
| When i say suggestions, I mean names. Members.
(that's another example, of how one language translated to another can lead to misunderstandings). About off topic, we have another post now. We can talk about it there. In this post, it would be good to have member suggestions. | ||||||
| stiltman posted 2009 Jun 06 00:41 | ||||||
| WTF, I'll nominate myself :) {American}
Hell I just want to read the mod forum and everything yado has said about me me private.....that should be a couple years of laughs :) :) :) Bait.....bait....hook um? | ||||||
| thecoalman posted 2009 Jun 06 01:12 | ||||||
| Moderator.......... the job everyone wants until they actually get it. :lol:
I'll second stilts nomination and suggest that he immediately ban Yoda. :P Ahh damn i miss the good aold days of picking on Yoda, posting nudy pics and generally having a good time. Moderator for off-topic? pfffffffffft... Nothing to moderate. Good thing we didn't have this fancy video tag... LOL [video]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-L6rEm0rnY[/video] | ||||||
| thecoalman posted 2009 Jun 06 01:15 | ||||||
Could be a site killer too. :wink: Off topic is essential to any forum if you want people coming back regularly especially when you're dealing with such a narrow subject. | ||||||
| stiltman posted 2009 Jun 06 01:23 | ||||||
I wouldn't ban him right away :lol: OK that is an inside joke between mods.....Yes at the time, not sure about now, mods could ban each other. So one mod banned another.....too funny... :lol: However, Thanks for the vote Coalman...long live COLD winters :wink: | ||||||
| jimmalenko posted 2009 Jun 06 04:15 | ||||||
| I'll throw my hat in the ring. | ||||||
| SatStorm posted 2009 Jun 06 06:18 | ||||||
| jimmalenko, you could be a really nice addition. We need someone from Australia around. | ||||||
| Supreme2k posted 2009 Jun 16 13:06 | ||||||
| If Faustus is really back, then I think that there are enough mods. He has been one of the best mods in terms of diplomacy and knowledge. As a close second, I'd go with offline. Though he sometimes moderated in sort of a jerk mode, he was great at explaining his position and clearing up misunderstandings.
Shock and awe: I'll throw myself in as a suggestion. On behalf of those who have derailed this thread, I offer my sincerest apologies to freebird. I have been on the receiving end of a ton of junk (especially lately), but it has not caused me to stalk members nor to post threats of death or violence. Those go well beyond a "thin line", as some may imply. People have to learn to roll with the punches, since they are harmless on a message board. I think that the current mods (BJ_M, Faustus, redwudz and mats) are very good at not taking posts personally. If we could get someone who will keep the same (mostly) clinical detachment to the boards and members, that would be the best outcome. I also agree that there should be more international mods, though more for variety's sake. It doesn't matter where the person is from: A proficient moderator can be that way from any location or origin. | ||||||
| Noahtuck posted 2009 Jun 16 13:51 | ||||||
Suuuuurvey says.... BUZZ!!!! X!!! WRONG!!!!!! :freak: | ||||||
| freebird73717 posted 2009 Jun 16 14:31 | ||||||
Faustus has been posting in offtopic lately. Haven't seen him anywhere else though. Of course he could be happy working behind the scenes.
Nothing to apologize for. There was some negative posts in this thread but honestly I expected some. Even though the thread started to go off track most posters were able to keep this thread on track after I requested that we stay on topic.
I also agree that an "international" mod would be good but I still can't think of a good one to suggest. No I'll take that back. Actually I do think that jimmalenko would make a good mod. I'm gonna also put in for edDV again. That guy is one of the most helpful & patient persons I've seen. Ultimately like another poster said, the decision is Baldricks. If he does choose a new mod it will be who he feels would be best. My whole point for this thread was just to see who the community thought would be a good mod. | ||||||
| Supreme2k posted 2009 Jun 17 16:36 | ||||||
I would not count out anyone who frequents Off Topic. On the contrary, it seems that someone who actively participates (outside of the Word Association) and posts new threads in OT would be more suited as a mod. People who frequent OT tend to have thicker skins and generally have a better sense of humor about these boards. While we don't want a robot as a mod, there is a certain detachment that someone with a decent sense of humor can bring to the position. In fact, someone with too much passion may be wrong for the job, as they may take simple opinions personally (favorite brands, + vs -, etc.). For the record, there was only one mod culled from OT, and he was an excellent mod up until the end. Sometimes it's not as much a "fail(ure)" as their term has run it's course. Everyone is only human. Their posting habits shouldn't be a symptom nor a cause for their faults, just as a person's geographic location shouldn't make them any better or worse a candidate for mod. As far as people from OT scaring off the newbies, that's (almost) completely untrue. As a matter of fact, sometimes they even bring them back. ============================= I will also second the nomination for stiltman, with the provision that he immediately reinstate jeex (who is not jaxxboss). :lol: I will also second and third my own nomination. Fortunately for most of us, this thread isn't Official anyway :P | ||||||
| fritzi93 posted 2009 Jun 18 12:24 | ||||||
Jeex would have a field day with this. :P Jaxxboss would have farted on this thread by now. If you and/or Stiltman are fool enough to want the job, I'll second (or fourth) the nominations. As to edDV, nah, he's like a.... um....professor emeritus or something here. He shouldn't have to soil his hands with Mod duties. :wink: | ||||||
| edDV posted 2009 Jun 18 12:34 | ||||||
| My brother is a cop. I'd rather not be one. | ||||||
| stiltman posted 2009 Jun 18 16:01 | ||||||
I wouldn't make a good mod outside of OT and Computers...I don't know enough :| | ||||||
| Supreme2k posted 2009 Jun 18 16:23 | ||||||
| Actually, moderators don't really need to know about the subject which they are moderating. It helps a bit, but you would be a moderator, not customer service. The purpose of these boards and regular members is to help people with questions. The moderator is basically the janitor, police, referee and bouncer.
There are often moderators and even judges IRL who know nothing about the subject which they are reviewing. | ||||||
| gll99 posted 2009 Jun 18 17:05 | ||||||
I agree with Supreme2k, This is not a new board where we depend on the moderators to be experts in everything. A few years ago I joined a new board and the moderators were disinterested and/or lacked subject matter knowledge and rarely commented. The site could not survive that because the membership was small and people rarely returned when questions weren't answered. Videohelp is a mature board with many involved members of varied expertize who participate regularly as can be seen by how few if any questions go unanswered. On top of that there are always areas where one doesn't have to be the resident expert to comment especially when it involves your own experience on a matter. If you lack knowledge in the mechanics of moderating a board, ie.. editing posts, moving threads etc... I'm sure that if you have some familiarity with using your computer that skill could be easily acquired with help from an existing mod to teach you. | ||||||
| redwudz posted 2009 Jun 18 23:05 | ||||||
| The job does come with this nifty teeshirt. But Baldrick never explained what it says :? .
Probably something in Swedish like you are a important person. :) 
Really, a Moderator spends most of their time moving posts around and correcting minor rules infractions and banning spammers. We have a number of members that might be suitable for a position, but that's up to Baldrick. | ||||||
| freebird73717 posted 2009 Jun 18 23:16 | ||||||
Run that through google translate and you'll get a laugh. :lol: | ||||||
| AlanHK posted 2009 Jun 18 23:18 | ||||||
| translation | ||||||
| silver007 posted 2009 Aug 15 10:03 | ||||||
| The key is to pick good, educated, STABLE moderators. Don't just stick some fool up as moderator just because he knows a lot about the technical things. Sometimes, savantes in one area fail miserably in others. For example, a moderator that knows a lot about the subject but simply cannot pick bad content from good. Let's face it, many mods have severe narcissistic tendencies and use the mods function to merely satisfy their insecurities about their own self-importance.
Moderating should not be limited to droids with manuals. Yeah, it's hard to pick the stable ones, but it's worth it I'd think. | ||||||
| stiltman posted 2009 Aug 16 00:38 | ||||||
| or to ppl digging up old threads :) :) :) |
Login/Register to our forum to be able to post here.