Forum Archive Home -> Camcorders (DV/HDV/AVCHD) -> DV vs. MPEG
DV vs. MPEG | ||
| videoboi posted 2007 Apr 27 20:42 | ||
| I have Sony Click to DVD on my computer and I noticed that in the settings window, it lets me chose to capture in DV or MPEG. Now I want to know which video type will give me the best quality. I know DV is gonna take some more room, but I would like to know which gets better quality. Note, we have standard televisions in the house. | ||
| edDV posted 2007 Apr 27 20:47 | ||
| DV transfers to the computer in full quality. The computer can then take time encoding to MPeg2 as needed.
Capturing to MPeg2 requires a fast CPU to make the conversion "on the fly" Even if the CPU is fast enough the quality will still be less because less time can be used for the encode. Try it both ways and see what you think. | ||
| videoboi posted 2007 Apr 27 20:50 | ||
| Thanks. And I saw that my computer also has a program called DVgate Plus. Is that like WinDV sortof? It says that it can capture DV from a camcorder. | ||
| guns1inger posted 2007 Apr 27 22:59 | ||
| Also, if you intend to edit or add titles, effects and transitions, DV is the better way to go. While there are now some very good mpeg editors that can do many of these things with minimal re-encoding, you cannot escape the fact that mpeg does not like being encoded multiple times, and things like transitions are the worst because they require high bitrate to get right in the first instance. | ||
| edDV posted 2007 Apr 28 00:32 | ||
DVGate is a Sony App. It works. I like WinDV for simple transfers. | ||
| videoboi posted 2007 Apr 28 12:35 | ||
| Okay, thanks for all your replies guys. |
Login/Register to our forum to be able to post here.